Smith & Nephew plc

Name: Smith & Nephew plc financial statements and ratios
Creator: Annalist

SN. · LSE · Health care, medical devices · United Kingdom · IFRS · Fiscal year ends December

Latest report: FY2025, the fiscal year ended 31 December 2025. Snapshot FY2025_28b24495.

Compare with peers Excel JSON

Overview

Revenue, fiscal year

+6.1% year on year

Operating profit, fiscal year

+20.9% year on year

Net income, fiscal year

+51.7% year on year

Diluted EPS, fiscal year

+52.3% year on year

Operating margin, fiscal year

+1.6pp year on year

Return on equity, fiscal year

+4.0pp year on year

Select a figure to see the document it came from.

Key Findings

Findings for the latest fiscal year, with their history over earlier years.

Revenue for the fiscal year ended 31 December 2025 was US$6.2 billion, 6.1% higher than in the previous fiscal year.
Strengthenedin FY2025 · stated since FY2023
Rule: Revenue against the previous fiscal year · Sources Annual financial report 2025-12
History of this finding, 3 records
1. FY2025 StrengthenedRevenue for the fiscal year ended 31 December 2025 was US$6.2 billion, 6.1% higher than in the previous fiscal year.Recorded from FY2025_28b24495 · data update
2. FY2024 WeakenedRevenue for the fiscal year ended 31 December 2024 was US$5.8 billion, 4.7% higher than in the previous fiscal year.Reconstructed · data update
3. FY2023 NewRevenue for the fiscal year ended 31 December 2023 was US$5.5 billion, 6.4% higher than in the previous fiscal year.Reconstructed · initial
Net income attributable to the company for fiscal 2025 was US$625 million, 51.7% higher than in the previous fiscal year.
Weakenedin FY2025 · stated since FY2023
Rule: Net income against the previous fiscal year · Sources Annual financial report 2025-12
History of this finding, 3 records
1. FY2025 WeakenedNet income attributable to the company for fiscal 2025 was US$625 million, 51.7% higher than in the previous fiscal year.Recorded from FY2025_28b24495 · data update
2. FY2024 StrengthenedNet income attributable to the company for fiscal 2024 was US$412 million, 56.7% higher than in the previous fiscal year.Reconstructed · data update
3. FY2023 NewNet income attributable to the company for fiscal 2023 was US$263 million, 17.9% higher than in the previous fiscal year.Reconstructed · initial
The operating margin for fiscal 2025 was 12.9%, 1.6 percentage points higher than a year earlier.
Weakenedin FY2025 · stated since FY2024
Rule: Operating margin against a year earlier · Sources Annual financial report 2025-12
History of this finding, 4 records
1. FY2025 WeakenedThe operating margin for fiscal 2025 was 12.9%, 1.6 percentage points higher than a year earlier.Recorded from FY2025_28b24495 · data update
2. FY2024 NewThe operating margin for fiscal 2024 was 11.3%, 3.6 percentage points higher than a year earlier.Reconstructed · data update
3. FY2024 RetiredThe finding changed to higher than a year earlier.Reconstructed · data update
4. FY2023 NewThe operating margin for fiscal 2023 was 7.7%, 1.0 percentage points lower than a year earlier.Reconstructed · initial
Return on equity for fiscal 2025 was 11.8%, against 7.9% a year earlier.
Strengthenedin FY2025 · stated since FY2023
Rule: Return on equity against a year earlier · Sources Annual financial report 2025-12, Annual financial report 2024-12
History of this finding, 3 records
1. FY2025 StrengthenedReturn on equity for fiscal 2025 was 11.8%, against 7.9% a year earlier.Recorded from FY2025_28b24495 · data update
2. FY2024 StrengthenedReturn on equity for fiscal 2024 was 7.9%, against 5.0% a year earlier.Reconstructed · data update
3. FY2023 NewReturn on equity for fiscal 2023 was 5.0%, against 4.1% a year earlier.Reconstructed · initial
Net debt was US$2.8 billion at 31 December 2025.
Confirmedin FY2025 · stated since FY2023
Rule: Net debt or net cash · Sources Annual financial report 2025-12
History of this finding, 3 records
1. FY2025 ConfirmedNet debt was US$2.8 billion at 31 December 2025.Recorded from FY2025_28b24495 · data update
2. FY2024 ConfirmedNet debt was US$2.7 billion at 31 December 2024.Reconstructed · data update
3. FY2023 NewNet debt was US$2.8 billion at 31 December 2023.Reconstructed · initial

Records before FY2025 are reconstructed from the latest snapshot. Ledger: findings.json.

Credit, liquidity, earnings quality and score findings: Analysis.

Data

Source documents5 documents, latest Annual financial report for the year to 31 December 2025List

DownloadsExcel workbook · JSON

SnapshotFY2025_28b24495

Corporate Events

Corporate events are listed for companies whose figures come from 10-K and 10-Q filings; none are listed for this company.

Earnings, Returns and Balance Sheet

Revenue

By fiscal year, US dollars

Operating Profit

By fiscal year, US dollars

Profit Attributable to Owners of the Parent

By fiscal year, US dollars

Margins

By fiscal year, per cent

Returns

By fiscal year, per cent

Net Debt

Total debt less cash and short-term investments, at fiscal year end, US dollars

Diluted Earnings per Share

By fiscal year, as reported

Financial Statements

Figures as filed. Select a figure for its source document and method; a small d marks a figure derived from other figures of the same report.

The statements are loading. They are also available as JSON and CSV.

Ratios

Select a ratio for its formula and the figures it uses, each with its document; (i) gives its definition.

The ratios are loading.

Analysis

Credit update

FY2025

Annual financial report for the year to 31 December 2025. Changes are against the previous report, and each figure shows its period.

0changes0thresholds crossed

Changes in This Report 0

No finding changed its state in the latest report.

Thresholds Crossed 0

No published finding crosses a threshold.

Fiscal years, with balances at each fiscal year end. Select a value for its formula and the figures it uses.

Credit MetricsDebt to EBITDA 2.36x, FFO to debt 33.7% · FY2025

Lease-adjusted debt, EBITDA and cash flow on the definitions of S&P and Moody's, as far as the filings allow.

Lease-adjusted debt was 2.4 times adjusted EBITDA for fiscal 2025, and funds from operations equalled 33.7% of that debt. Both ratios are within the intermediate band of the S&P standard volatility table.
Interpretation. Debt to EBITDA shows how many years of EBITDA the debt equals, and FFO to debt the share of the debt that 1 year of cash flow after interest and taxes would repay. The S&P table sorts both into 6 bands; the intermediate band is number 3 of 6, and a higher number means more debt against earnings.
Confirmedin FY2025 · stated since FY2023
Rule: Debt against the S&P benchmark bands · Sources Annual financial report 2025-12
History of this finding, 3 records
1. FY2025 ConfirmedLease-adjusted debt was 2.4 times adjusted EBITDA for fiscal 2025, and funds from operations equalled 33.7% of that debt. Both ratios are within the intermediate band of the S&P standard volatility table.Recorded from FY2025_28b24495 · data update
2. FY2024 ConfirmedLease-adjusted debt was 2.5 times adjusted EBITDA for fiscal 2024, and funds from operations equalled 32.0% of that debt. Both ratios are within the intermediate band of the S&P standard volatility table.Reconstructed · data update
3. FY2023 NewLease-adjusted debt was 2.7 times adjusted EBITDA for fiscal 2023, and funds from operations equalled 29.8% of that debt. Debt to EBITDA is within the intermediate band of the S&P standard volatility table and FFO to debt within the significant band.Reconstructed · initial

Position in the S&P Standard Volatility Table, Fiscal 2025

S&P sorts companies into 6 bands by debt against earnings and cash flow, from the least debt to the most.

Debt equals 2.4 years of adjusted EBITDA; a year of funds from operations equals 33.7% of it.

Band	Minimal	Modest	Intermediate	Significant	Aggressive	Highly leveraged
Debt to EBITDA	below 1.5x	1.5x to 2x	2.36x2x to 3x	3x to 4x	4x to 5x	5x and above
FFO to debt	60% and above	45% to 60%	33.7%30% to 45%	20% to 30%	12% to 20%	below 12%

By Fiscal Year

Ratio	FY202131 Dec 2021	FY202231 Dec 2022	FY202331 Dec 2023	FY202431 Dec 2024	FY202531 Dec 2025
Lease-adjusted debtBorrowings plus the obligations of long-term leases, such as rents of stores, offices and warehouses, which credit analysts count as debt.Total debt: borrowings + lease liabilities, or the lines that present them together; IFRS 16 puts every lease on the balance sheet
Adjusted EBITDAOperating profit before depreciation, amortisation, the impairment reported with them and pay in shares: the earnings that credit analysts set against debt.EBIT + depreciation and amortisation, with the impairment that the company reports together with them, + share-based payments; depreciation includes that of right-of-use assets, so no lease cost is added
Funds from operationsAdjusted EBITDA less interest and tax paid in cash: the cash the business produces each year for investment, dividends and debt repayment.Adjusted EBITDA - cash interest - cash taxes; cash interest includes the interest on lease liabilities
Debt to EBITDALease-adjusted debt measured in years of adjusted EBITDA. A figure of 3 means debt equals 3 years of those earnings; a lower figure means less debt against earnings.Lease-adjusted debt / adjusted EBITDA	intermediate	intermediate	intermediate	intermediate	intermediate
FFO to debtFunds from operations as a share of lease-adjusted debt. A figure of 25% means a year of those funds equals a quarter of the debt; a higher figure means less debt.Funds from operations / lease-adjusted debt	intermediate	intermediate	significant	intermediate	intermediate
Net debt to adjusted EBITDADebt to EBITDA after cash and short-term investments are set against the debt.(Lease-adjusted debt - cash - short-term investments) / adjusted EBITDA
Operating cash flow to debtOperating cash flow after interest paid, as a share of debt with lease liabilities. A higher share means the debt could be repaid sooner from operating cash.Operating cash flow after interest paid / lease-adjusted debt; interest paid that the company classifies as financing activities is deducted
Retained cash flow to net debtFunds from operations left after dividends, as a share of debt net of cash.(FFO - dividends) / (lease-adjusted debt - cash - short-term investments)
FFO cash interest coverThe number of times cash earnings cover cash interest, lease interest included.(FFO + cash interest) / cash interest; cash interest includes the interest on lease liabilities
Liquid assets to debtCash and short-term investments as a share of lease-adjusted debt: the part of the debt that cash on hand could repay at once.(Cash + short-term investments) / lease-adjusted debt

Reconciliation of the Credit Figures

Item	FY202131 Dec 2021	FY202231 Dec 2022	FY202331 Dec 2023	FY202431 Dec 2024	FY202531 Dec 2025
Borrowings	$0	$0	$0	$0	$0
Lease liabilities	$0	$0	$0	$0	$0
Borrowings and lease liabilities presented as one line	$3.3bn	$2.9bn	$3.1bn	$3.3bn	$3.3bn
Lease-adjusted debt	$3.3bn	$2.9bn	$3.1bn	$3.3bn	$3.3bn
EBIT	$593m	$450m	$425m	$657m	$794m
Depreciation and amortisation, with the impairment reported with them	$567m	$617m	$683m	$645m	$573m
Share-based payments	$41.0m	$40.0m	$39.0m	$40.0m	$43.0m
Adjusted EBITDA	$1.2bn	$1.1bn	$1.1bn	$1.3bn	$1.4bn
Cash interest	−$80.0m	−$73.0m	−$104m	−$140m	−$142m
Cash taxes	−$97.0m	−$47.0m	−$125m	−$140m	−$147m
Funds from operations	$1.0bn	$987m	$918m	$1.1bn	$1.1bn

Method

Total debt is borrowings and lease liabilities, current and non-current, before the deduction of cash. Under IFRS 16 every lease is on the balance sheet, depreciation includes that of right-of-use assets and finance costs include the interest on lease liabilities, so no lease cost or lease interest is added.
Adjusted EBITDA adds share-based payments, and the impairment that the company reports with depreciation and amortisation, to EBIT and depreciation and amortisation. FFO deducts cash interest and cash taxes.
S&P applies its table to its own adjusted figures, which also deduct surplus cash and adjust for pensions and other items, so the band of an S&P calculation can differ.

Liquidity and MaturitiesCash and operating cash flow against debt due within 12 months, capital expenditure and dividends.

Cash and operating cash flow against debt due within 12 months, capital expenditure and dividends.

By Fiscal Year

Ratio	FY202131 Dec 2021	FY202231 Dec 2022	FY202331 Dec 2023	FY202431 Dec 2024	FY202531 Dec 2025
Debt due within 12 monthsBorrowings and lease liabilities due within the next 12 months, which the company must repay or refinance.Current borrowings + current lease liabilities, or the current line that presents them together

Method

Debt due within 12 months is current borrowings and current lease liabilities.
Capital expenditure and dividends of the fiscal year are taken as those of the next 12 months. Undrawn credit facilities are not included.

Earnings QualityCash-flow accruals −6.3% · FY2025

Accruals and the cash backing of reported earnings.

Operating cash flow for fiscal 2025 exceeded net income attributable to the company by an amount equal to 6.3% of average total assets.
Interpretation. The profit came in as cash: operating cash flow was larger than net income. Profit backed by cash tends to repeat more than profit made of accounting entries (Sloan, 1996).
Strengthenedin FY2025 · stated since FY2023
Rule: Cash backing of earnings · Sources Annual financial report 2025-12
History of this finding, 3 records
1. FY2025 StrengthenedOperating cash flow for fiscal 2025 exceeded net income attributable to the company by an amount equal to 6.3% of average total assets.Recorded from FY2025_28b24495 · data update
2. FY2024 StrengthenedOperating cash flow for fiscal 2024 exceeded net income attributable to the company by an amount equal to 5.7% of average total assets.Reconstructed · data update
3. FY2023 NewOperating cash flow for fiscal 2023 exceeded net income attributable to the company by an amount equal to 3.5% of average total assets.Reconstructed · initial

By Fiscal Year

Ratio	FY202131 Dec 2021	FY202231 Dec 2022	FY202331 Dec 2023	FY202431 Dec 2024	FY202531 Dec 2025
Cash-flow accrualsNet income less operating cash flow, against average assets: the part of profit not received in cash in the same period. Research associates high accruals with lower earnings in later years; a negative figure means cash exceeded profit.(Net income attributable to the company - operating cash flow) / average total assets
Total accrualsAccruals that also cover long-term operating and financial assets and liabilities (Richardson, Sloan, Soliman and Tuna, 2005). Acquisitions raise the figure.Change in net operating working capital, net non-current operating assets and net financial assets / average total assets (Richardson, Sloan, Soliman and Tuna, 2005)

Method

Cash-flow accruals are net income attributable to the company less operating cash flow, over average total assets. Balance sheet accruals follow Sloan (1996) and total accruals Richardson, Sloan, Soliman and Tuna (2005).
Balance sheet and total accruals include the assets and liabilities that acquisitions bring in and disposals take out; cash-flow accruals exclude them.

Forensic and Distress ScoresAltman Z'' 4.82, Beneish −2.63 · Piotroski 7 of 9 · FY2025

Published distress and misstatement models, with their original coefficients and thresholds.

The Altman Z'' score for fiscal 2025 was 4.82, above the safe threshold of 2.60.
Interpretation. By this model, the balance sheet and earnings look like those of companies that did not go bankrupt in its original study: above 2.60 means safe, below 1.10 distress.
Confirmedin FY2025 · stated since FY2023
Rule: Altman Z'' zone · Sources Annual financial report 2025-12
History of this finding, 3 records
1. FY2025 ConfirmedThe Altman Z'' score for fiscal 2025 was 4.82, above the safe threshold of 2.60.Recorded from FY2025_28b24495 · data update
2. FY2024 StrengthenedThe Altman Z'' score for fiscal 2024 was 4.92, above the safe threshold of 2.60.Reconstructed · data update
3. FY2023 NewThe Altman Z'' score for fiscal 2023 was 4.19, above the safe threshold of 2.60.Reconstructed · initial
The Beneish M-score for fiscal 2023 was minus 2.63, below the model threshold of minus 1.78.
Interpretation. The model finds no sign of earnings manipulation. Beneish (1999) set a threshold of minus 1.78, above which a company resembles the companies that manipulated their earnings.
Newin FY2023 · first stated
Rule: Beneish M-score against its threshold · Sources Annual financial report 2023-12, Annual financial report 2024-12, Annual financial report 2025-12
History of this finding, 1 record
1. FY2023 NewThe Beneish M-score for fiscal 2023 was minus 2.63, below the model threshold of minus 1.78.Reconstructed · initial
The Piotroski F-score for fiscal 2025 was 7 of 9. The 2 signals not met were current ratio higher than a year earlier and margin higher than a year earlier.
Interpretation. The score counts how many of 9 tests of profit, debt, liquidity and efficiency the company passes. A score of 7 to 9 is the strongest group: Piotroski (2000) placed 0 to 3 in the weakest.
Weakenedin FY2025 · stated since FY2023
Rule: Piotroski F-score · Sources Annual financial report 2024-12, Annual financial report 2025-12
History of this finding, 3 records
1. FY2025 WeakenedThe Piotroski F-score for fiscal 2025 was 7 of 9. The 2 signals not met were current ratio higher than a year earlier and margin higher than a year earlier.Recorded from FY2025_28b24495 · data update
2. FY2024 StrengthenedThe Piotroski F-score for fiscal 2024 was 8 of 9. The signal not met was long-term debt to assets lower than a year earlier.Reconstructed · data update
3. FY2023 NewThe Piotroski F-score for fiscal 2023 was 7 of 9. The 2 signals not met were current ratio higher than a year earlier and margin higher than a year earlier.Reconstructed · initial

By Fiscal Year

Ratio	FY202131 Dec 2021	FY202231 Dec 2022	FY202331 Dec 2023	FY202431 Dec 2024	FY202531 Dec 2025
Altman Z'' scoreA measure of the risk of financial distress, built from working capital, retained earnings, operating profit and equity. Above 2.60 the model counts a company as safe and below 1.10 as in distress; between the 2 is a grey zone.6.56 x working capital / total assets + 3.26 x retained earnings / total assets + 6.72 x EBIT / total assets + 1.05 x total equity / total liabilities (Altman, 1995); distress zone below 1.10, safe zone above 2.60	safe zone	safe zone	safe zone	safe zone	safe zone
Beneish M-scoreA screen for earnings manipulation, built from 8 changes in the accounts, such as receivables growing faster than sales. Above minus 1.78 the model groups a company with the companies in the Beneish sample that manipulated their earnings.-4.84 + 0.920 DSRI + 0.528 GMI + 0.404 AQI + 0.892 SGI + 0.115 DEPI - 0.172 SGAI + 4.679 TATA - 0.327 LVGI (Beneish, 1999); model threshold -1.78	below threshold	below threshold	below threshold	n/a	n/a
Dechow F-scoreThe probability of a material misstatement in the accounts, estimated from accruals, receivables, stock, cash sales, profitability and new financing, against the average. A score of 1 means average risk and 2 means twice the average.Predicted probability of a misstatement (model 1 of Dechow, Ge, Larson and Sloan, 2011) / 0.0037, the unconditional probability; 1 equals the base rate	n/a
Piotroski F-scoreA count of 9 yes or no tests on profitability, cash flow, debt, liquidity, new shares, margins and the use of assets. A score of 7 to 9 indicates improving strength and 0 to 3 indicates weakness.Number of 9 binary signals met on profitability, cash flow, debt, liquidity, equity issuance, margin and asset turnover (Piotroski, 2000)	n/a

Altman Z'' Score

fiscal 2025

A measure of the risk of financial distress, built from working capital, retained earnings, operating profit and equity. Above 2.60 the model counts a company as safe and below 1.10 as in distress; between the 2 is a grey zone.

Distress zone, below 1.10

Grey zone, 1.10 to 2.60

4.82Safe zone, above 2.60

The score of 4.82 is in the safe zone of the model, above 2.60. The largest part is retained earnings, at 1.66.

Part	Value	Coefficient	Contribution
Working capital / total assetsCurrent assets less current liabilities, against total assets: the short-term funds available for operations.	0.240	6.560	1.573
Retained earnings / total assetsProfits kept in the business over its life, against total assets.	0.509	3.260	1.659
EBIT / total assetsOperating profit against total assets: the earning power of the assets.	0.076	6.720	0.510
Total equity / total liabilitiesBook equity against liabilities: how far the assets could fall in value before liabilities exceed them.	1.023	1.050	1.075
Score			4.818

Altman, Hartzell and Peck (1995), for non-manufacturing companies. The model omits the ratio of sales to total assets of the 1968 model and uses book equity. Working capital below zero and equity reduced by share repurchases lower the score.

Beneish M-score

fiscal 2023

A screen for earnings manipulation, built from 8 changes in the accounts, such as receivables growing faster than sales. Above minus 1.78 the model groups a company with the companies in the Beneish sample that manipulated their earnings.

−2.63Below the threshold, −1.78 and below

Above the threshold, above −1.78

The score of minus 2.63 is below the model threshold of minus 1.78. Of the 8 measures, sales growth raises the score most.

Part	Value	Coefficient	Contribution
Intercept			−4.840
Days sales in receivables indexReceivables against sales, against a year earlier. A rise can mean sales recorded before customers pay.	0.967	0.920	0.889
Gross margin indexGross margin a year earlier against the current gross margin. Above 1, margins fell, which the model treats as a risk factor.	1.024	0.528	0.541
Asset quality indexAssets other than current assets and property, plant and equipment, as a share of total assets, against a year earlier. A rise can mean more costs recorded as assets.	0.962	0.404	0.389
Sales growth indexSales against a year earlier. The model treats fast growth as a risk factor.	1.064	0.892	0.949
Depreciation indexThe rate of depreciation a year earlier against the current rate. Above 1, depreciation slowed, which raises profit.	1.000	0.115	0.115
Selling, general and administrative expenses indexOverheads against sales, against a year earlier.	0.997	−0.172	−0.171
Total accruals to total assetsNet income less operating cash flow, against total assets: profit not backed by cash. It carries the largest coefficient in the model.	−0.035	4.679	−0.162
Leverage indexDebt against total assets, against a year earlier.	1.035	−0.327	−0.338
Score			−2.629

Beneish (1999), estimated on 74 companies identified as earnings manipulators in SEC enforcement releases and the press for 1982 to 1992, against 2,332 Compustat companies. The model classes a score above minus 1.78 with the first group. An index whose inputs are not reported counts as 1.

Dechow F-score

fiscal 2025

The probability of a material misstatement in the accounts, estimated from accruals, receivables, stock, cash sales, profitability and new financing, against the average. A score of 1 means average risk and 2 means twice the average.

A score of 0.64 means a probability of a misstatement 0.64 times the average rate in the Dechow sample: 0.24% against 0.37%.

Part	Value	Coefficient	Contribution
Intercept			−7.893
Total accruals (Richardson, Sloan, Soliman and Tuna)Total accruals: the growth of operating and financial assets net of liabilities, against average assets.	0.008	0.790	0.007
Change in receivables / average total assetsThe growth of receivables against average assets.	0.003	2.518	0.008
Change in inventories / average total assetsThe growth of stock against average assets.	−0.026	1.191	−0.031
Assets other than cash and property, plant and equipment / total assetsAssets other than cash and property, plant and equipment, as a share of total assets: assets whose value depends more on judgement.	0.947	1.979	1.874
Change in cash salesThe growth of sales collected in cash.	0.070	0.171	0.012
Change in return on assetsThe change in return on assets against a year earlier. A fall raises the score.	0.020	−0.932	−0.018
Debt or equity issued in the year, 1 or 01 when the company issued shares or debt in the year.	0.000	1.029	0.000
Predicted value			−6.042
Probability of a misstatement			0.24%

Model 1 of Dechow, Ge, Larson and Sloan (2011), estimated on misstatements named in SEC Accounting and Auditing Enforcement Releases. The score is the predicted probability of a misstatement over 0.37%, the unconditional probability in their sample, so 1.00 equals that base rate.

Piotroski F-score

fiscal 2025

A count of 9 yes or no tests on profitability, cash flow, debt, liquidity, new shares, margins and the use of assets. A score of 7 to 9 indicates improving strength and 0 to 3 indicates weakness.

7 of the 9 tests are met, in the high group of 7 to 9.

Signal	FY2025	FY2024
Return on assets above zero	Met	Met
Operating cash flow above zero	Met	Met
Return on assets higher than a year earlier	Met	Met
Operating cash flow above net income	Met	Met
Long-term debt to assets lower than a year earlier	Met	Not met
Current ratio higher than a year earlier	Not met	Met
No common equity issued	Met	Met
Margin higher than a year earlier	Not met	Met
Asset turnover higher than a year earlier	Met	Met

Piotroski (2000), 9 signals on profitability, funding and operating efficiency, designed for companies with high book-to-market ratios. Piotroski grouped scores of 8 and 9 as high and 0 and 1 as low; the findings group 7 to 9 and 0 to 3.

Source Documents

Documents of this snapshot, latest first. A report that states no date of publication carries the date on which the public index of structured annual reports added it.

Document	Date	Id
Annual financial report for the year to 31 December 2025 Search page of the FCA National Storage Mechanism	18 Mar 2026, added to the index	AFR:213800ZTMDN8S67S1H61-2025-12-31-0
Annual financial report for the year to 31 December 2024 Search page of the FCA National Storage Mechanism	11 Mar 2025, added to the index	AFR:213800ZTMDN8S67S1H61-2024-12-31-0
Annual financial report for the year to 31 December 2023 Search page of the FCA National Storage Mechanism	18 Mar 2024, added to the index	AFR:213800ZTMDN8S67S1H61-2023-12-31-0
Annual financial report for the year to 31 December 2022 Search page of the FCA National Storage Mechanism	7 Mar 2023, added to the index	AFR:213800ZTMDN8S67S1H61-2022-12-31-0
Annual financial report for the year to 31 December 2021 Search page of the FCA National Storage Mechanism	8 Mar 2022, added to the index	AFR:213800ZTMDN8S67S1H61-2021-12-31-0

Checks

252252 checks, all passed

Fiscal calendar11 passedFiscal years last 350 to 380 days, and each starts on the day after the one before. Checked at error level.

Coverage2 passedThe latest fiscal year gives total assets and a profit figure. Checked at error level.

Balance sheet identity6 passedTotal assets equal total liabilities and equity at each balance sheet date. Checked at error level.

Gross profit6 passedRevenue less cost of sales equals the gross profit that the company presents. A gross profit that differs is withheld, and so is a cost of sales that the company gives without gross profit. Checked at warning level.

Earnings per share5 passedProfit divided by earnings per share gives a number of shares in line with the other years. Checked at warning level.

Agreement with the 20-F222 passedEach figure equals the figure of the annual report on Form 20-F that the company files with the SEC for the same fiscal year. A figure that differs is withheld. Checked at warning level.

Data Quality

How many values of this snapshot the checks prove, and how many Annalist derives, withholds and tracks as restated. Every company.

Values published	238
Proven by a check	93.3%, 222 values
Confirmed by a second document	93.3%, 222 values
Derived from reported figures	2.1%, 5 values
Values withheld	0
Restated figures tracked	6
Changes compared on one basis	0
Company lines mapped	0 of 0 reviewed

Citation

Annalist, Smith & Nephew plc, snapshot smith-nephew/FY2025_28b24495 (as of FY2025); <item label>, <period>; source <document id> (<document url>)

Snapshot FY2025_28b24495 · dataset SHA-256 28b24495694be8ad18535521789d3bce20fff87359ccddb6f9f60a8b396b9bb7 · findings rules 0.4

Data: info.json · dataset.json · validation.json · documents.json