Arista Networks, Inc.
Latest report: Q2 FY2026, the quarter ended 30 June 2026, released 5 August 2026. Snapshot FY2026Q2_2c2dfa16.
Overview
Select a figure to see the document it came from.
Key Findings
Findings for the latest quarter, with their history over earlier quarters.
Revenue for the quarter ended 30 June 2026 was US$3.0 billion, 37.7% higher than in the same quarter a year earlier.
Strengthenedin Q2 FY2026 · stated since Q2 FY2024Rule: Revenue against a year earlier · Sources 10-Q 2026-06History of this finding, 9 records
- Q2 FY2026 StrengthenedRevenue for the quarter ended 30 June 2026 was US$3.0 billion, 37.7% higher than in the same quarter a year earlier.Recorded from FY2026Q2_cc2991fc · data update
- Q1 FY2026 StrengthenedRevenue for the quarter ended 31 March 2026 was US$2.7 billion, 35.1% higher than in the same quarter a year earlier.Reconstructed · data update
- Q4 FY2025 StrengthenedRevenue for the quarter ended 31 December 2025 was US$2.5 billion, 28.9% higher than in the same quarter a year earlier.Reconstructed · data update
- Q3 FY2025 WeakenedRevenue for the quarter ended 30 September 2025 was US$2.3 billion, 27.5% higher than in the same quarter a year earlier.Reconstructed · data update
- Q2 FY2025 StrengthenedRevenue for the quarter ended 30 June 2025 was US$2.2 billion, 30.4% higher than in the same quarter a year earlier.Reconstructed · data update
- Q1 FY2025 StrengthenedRevenue for the quarter ended 31 March 2025 was US$2.0 billion, 27.6% higher than in the same quarter a year earlier.Reconstructed · data update
- Q4 FY2024 StrengthenedRevenue for the quarter ended 31 December 2024 was US$1.9 billion, 25.3% higher than in the same quarter a year earlier.Reconstructed · data update
- Q3 FY2024 StrengthenedRevenue for the quarter ended 30 September 2024 was US$1.8 billion, 20.0% higher than in the same quarter a year earlier.Reconstructed · data update
- Q2 FY2024 NewRevenue for the quarter ended 30 June 2024 was US$1.7 billion, 15.9% higher than in the same quarter a year earlier.Reconstructed · initial
Net income attributable to the company was US$1.2 billion, 36.5% higher than in the same quarter a year earlier.
Strengthenedin Q2 FY2026 · stated since Q2 FY2024Rule: Net income against a year earlier · Sources 10-Q 2026-06History of this finding, 9 records
- Q2 FY2026 StrengthenedNet income attributable to the company was US$1.2 billion, 36.5% higher than in the same quarter a year earlier.Recorded from FY2026Q2_cc2991fc · data update
- Q1 FY2026 StrengthenedNet income attributable to the company was US$1.0 billion, 25.7% higher than in the same quarter a year earlier.Reconstructed · data update
- Q4 FY2025 StrengthenedNet income attributable to the company was US$956 million, 19.3% higher than in the same quarter a year earlier.Reconstructed · data update
- Q3 FY2025 WeakenedNet income attributable to the company was US$853 million, 14.0% higher than in the same quarter a year earlier.Reconstructed · data update
- Q2 FY2025 StrengthenedNet income attributable to the company was US$889 million, 33.6% higher than in the same quarter a year earlier.Reconstructed · data update
- Q1 FY2025 WeakenedNet income attributable to the company was US$814 million, 27.6% higher than in the same quarter a year earlier.Reconstructed · data update
- Q4 FY2024 WeakenedNet income attributable to the company was US$801 million, 30.5% higher than in the same quarter a year earlier.Reconstructed · data update
- Q3 FY2024 StrengthenedNet income attributable to the company was US$748 million, 37.2% higher than in the same quarter a year earlier.Reconstructed · data update
- Q2 FY2024 NewNet income attributable to the company was US$665 million, 35.3% higher than in the same quarter a year earlier.Reconstructed · initial
The operating margin over the last 4 quarters was 43.1%, unchanged from a year earlier.
Newin Q2 FY2026 · first statedRule: Operating margin against a year earlier · Sources 10-Q 2025-09, 10-K 2025-12, 10-Q 2026-03 and 1 moreHistory of this finding, 10 records
- Q2 FY2026 NewThe operating margin over the last 4 quarters was 43.1%, unchanged from a year earlier.Recorded from FY2026Q2_cc2991fc · data update
- Q2 FY2026 RetiredThe finding changed to unchanged from a year earlier.Recorded from FY2026Q2_cc2991fc · data update
- Q1 FY2026 WeakenedThe operating margin over the last 4 quarters was 42.8%, 0.5 percentage points higher than a year earlier.Reconstructed · data update
- Q4 FY2025 ConfirmedThe operating margin over the last 4 quarters was 42.8%, 0.8 percentage points higher than a year earlier.Reconstructed · data update
- Q3 FY2025 WeakenedThe operating margin over the last 4 quarters was 42.9%, 0.8 percentage points higher than a year earlier.Reconstructed · data update
- Q2 FY2025 WeakenedThe operating margin over the last 4 quarters was 43.1%, 1.9 percentage points higher than a year earlier.Reconstructed · data update
- Q1 FY2025 WeakenedThe operating margin over the last 4 quarters was 42.3%, 2.3 percentage points higher than a year earlier.Reconstructed · data update
- Q4 FY2024 WeakenedThe operating margin over the last 4 quarters was 42.0%, 3.5 percentage points higher than a year earlier.Reconstructed · data update
- Q3 FY2024 WeakenedThe operating margin over the last 4 quarters was 42.1%, 4.8 percentage points higher than a year earlier.Reconstructed · data update
- Q2 FY2024 NewThe operating margin over the last 4 quarters was 41.2%, 5.1 percentage points higher than a year earlier.Reconstructed · initial
Return on equity over the last 4 quarters was 31.5%, against 33.6% a year earlier.
Confirmedin Q2 FY2026 · stated since Q2 FY2024Rule: Return on equity against a year earlier · Sources 10-Q 2025-06, 10-Q 2026-06, 10-Q 2025-09 and 3 moreHistory of this finding, 9 records
- Q2 FY2026 ConfirmedReturn on equity over the last 4 quarters was 31.5%, against 33.6% a year earlier.Recorded from FY2026Q2_cc2991fc · data update
- Q1 FY2026 ConfirmedReturn on equity over the last 4 quarters was 31.5%, against 33.7% a year earlier.Reconstructed · data update
- Q4 FY2025 ConfirmedReturn on equity over the last 4 quarters was 31.4%, against 33.1% a year earlier.Reconstructed · data update
- Q3 FY2025 StrengthenedReturn on equity over the last 4 quarters was 31.7%, against 33.8% a year earlier.Reconstructed · data update
- Q2 FY2025 ConfirmedReturn on equity over the last 4 quarters was 33.6%, against 34.5% a year earlier.Reconstructed · data update
- Q1 FY2025 ConfirmedReturn on equity over the last 4 quarters was 33.7%, against 34.7% a year earlier.Reconstructed · data update
- Q4 FY2024 ConfirmedReturn on equity over the last 4 quarters was 33.1%, against 34.5% a year earlier.Reconstructed · data update
- Q3 FY2024 StrengthenedReturn on equity over the last 4 quarters was 33.8%, against 34.9% a year earlier.Reconstructed · data update
- Q2 FY2024 NewReturn on equity over the last 4 quarters was 34.5%, against 34.7% a year earlier.Reconstructed · initial
Records before Q2 FY2026 are reconstructed from the latest snapshot. Ledger: findings.json. Correction of 20 October 2026: The quarterly depreciation and amortisation of Arista Networks mixed the total of its cash flow statement with depreciation alone; every quarter now comes from the total. Arista Networks reports its capital expenditure on one line in its 10-Qs and another in its 10-Ks, with no period in common that would show them equal, so its fourth quarters and fiscal years of capital expenditure are no longer published. Record 67 retires its free cash flow over the last 4 quarters, which needs them. Records 3, 4, 5, 6, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 28, 29, 30, 34, 35, 36, 40, 41, 42, 48, 57 and 64 cite figures that the correction changed. Correction of 22 October 2026: Changes against a year earlier compared 2 figures of different bases where a stock split, a spin-off or a restatement came between the 2 periods. 21 growth values of Arista Networks changed, among them diluted earnings per share growth for fiscal 2022, minus 59.3% before the correction and 62.4% on one basis. Records 16 and 17 cite figures of 2 bases, which give the same rounded changes as one basis.
Credit, liquidity, earnings quality and score findings: Analysis.
Findings No Longer Stated
Rules whose findings applied in earlier quarters but not in the latest one.
Free cash flow · retired in Q2 FY2026
- Q2 FY2026 RetiredThe rule did not apply to the figures as at Q2 FY2026.Recorded from FY2026Q2_8a6897be · correction
- Q2 FY2026 ConfirmedFree cash flow over the last 4 quarters was US$5.2 billion, and operating cash flow was 1.3 times net income attributable to the company.Recorded from FY2026Q2_cc2991fc · data update
- Q1 FY2026 StrengthenedFree cash flow over the last 4 quarters was US$5.3 billion, and operating cash flow was 1.5 times net income attributable to the company.Reconstructed · data update
- Q4 FY2025 StrengthenedFree cash flow over the last 4 quarters was US$4.3 billion, and operating cash flow was 1.2 times net income attributable to the company.Reconstructed · data update
- Q3 FY2025 ConfirmedFree cash flow over the last 4 quarters was US$4.0 billion, and operating cash flow was 1.2 times net income attributable to the company.Reconstructed · data update
- Q2 FY2025 StrengthenedFree cash flow over the last 4 quarters was US$4.0 billion, and operating cash flow was 1.2 times net income attributable to the company.Reconstructed · data update
- Q1 FY2025 ConfirmedFree cash flow over the last 4 quarters was US$3.8 billion, and operating cash flow was 1.3 times net income attributable to the company.Reconstructed · data update
- Q4 FY2024 StrengthenedFree cash flow over the last 4 quarters was US$3.7 billion, and operating cash flow was 1.3 times net income attributable to the company.Reconstructed · data update
- Q3 FY2024 StrengthenedFree cash flow over the last 4 quarters was US$3.2 billion, and operating cash flow was 1.2 times net income attributable to the company.Reconstructed · data update
- Q2 FY2024 NewFree cash flow over the last 4 quarters was US$2.7 billion, and operating cash flow was 1.1 times net income attributable to the company.Reconstructed · initial
Data
FY2026Q2_2c2dfa16Corporate Events
- Stock split19 February 2025
The filing reported a stock split of 4 for 1.
Source 10-K 2024-12 - Stock split15 February 2022
The filing reported a stock split of 4 for 1.
Source 10-K 2021-12
Earnings, Returns and Balance Sheet
Revenue
By quarter, US dollars
Operating Income
By quarter, US dollars
Net Income Attributable to the Company
By quarter, US dollars
Margins
Last 4 quarters at each quarter end, per cent
Returns
Last 4 quarters, per cent
Free Cash Flow
Operating cash flow less capital expenditure, by quarter, US dollars
Diluted Earnings per Share
By quarter, as reported
Financial Statements
Figures as filed. Select a figure for its source document and method; a small d marks a quarter derived from cumulative reports.
The statements are loading. They are also available as JSON and CSV.
Ratios
Select a ratio for its formula and the figures it uses, each with its document; (i) gives its definition.
The ratios are loading.
Analysis
Credit update
Q2 FY2026
Form 10-Q, period ended 30 June 2026, filed 5 August 2026. Changes are against the previous report, and each figure shows its period.
Changes in This Report 3
- StrengthenedRevenue Against a Year Earlier10-Q 2026-06
Revenue for the quarter ended 30 June 2026 was US$3.0 billion, 37.7% higher than in the same quarter a year earlier.
Earlier record, Q1 FY2026
Revenue for the quarter ended 31 March 2026 was US$2.7 billion, 35.1% higher than in the same quarter a year earlier.
- StrengthenedNet Income Against a Year Earlier10-Q 2026-06
Net income attributable to the company was US$1.2 billion, 36.5% higher than in the same quarter a year earlier.
Earlier record, Q1 FY2026
Net income attributable to the company was US$1.0 billion, 25.7% higher than in the same quarter a year earlier.
- NewOperating Margin Against a Year Earlier10-Q 2026-06
The operating margin over the last 4 quarters was 43.1%, unchanged from a year earlier.
Earlier record, Q1 FY2026
The operating margin over the last 4 quarters was 42.8%, 0.5 percentage points higher than a year earlier.
Thresholds Crossed 0
No published finding crosses a threshold.
Fiscal years and the latest quarter, with flows over the last 4 quarters and balances at the quarter end. Select a value for its formula and the figures it uses.
Credit MetricsLease-adjusted debt, EBITDA and cash flow on the definitions of S&P and Moody's, as far as the filings allow.
Lease-adjusted debt, EBITDA and cash flow on the definitions of S&P and Moody's, as far as the filings allow.
By Fiscal Year
| Ratio | FY202031 Dec 2020 | FY202131 Dec 2021 | FY202231 Dec 2022 | FY202331 Dec 2023 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Adjusted EBITDAOperating profit before depreciation, amortisation, goodwill impairment, pay in shares and lease costs: the earnings that credit analysts set against lease-adjusted debt.EBIT + depreciation and amortisation + goodwill impairment + share-based compensation + operating lease cost |
Reconciliation of the Credit Figures
| Item | FY202031 Dec 2020 | FY202131 Dec 2021 | FY202231 Dec 2022 | FY202331 Dec 2023 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| EBIT | $700m | $925m | $1.5bn | $2.3bn |
| Depreciation and amortisation | $35.2m | $50.3m | $62.7m | $70.6m |
| Goodwill impairment | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 |
| Share-based compensation | $137m | $187m | $231m | $297m |
| Operating lease cost | $23.4m | $23.2m | $24.1m | $23.5m |
| Adjusted EBITDA | $895m | $1.2bn | $1.8bn | $2.6bn |
Method
- Lease-adjusted debt is total debt plus operating lease liabilities, before the deduction of cash. Adjusted EBITDA adds goodwill impairment, share-based compensation and operating lease cost to EBIT and depreciation and amortisation; restructuring and litigation charges, other impairments and profits on disposals stay in EBIT. FFO deducts cash interest, lease interest and cash taxes.
- Lease interest is the average operating lease liability times the weighted average discount rate of the leases, or the implied cost of debt where the rate is not reported.
- S&P applies its table to its own adjusted figures, which also deduct surplus cash and adjust for pensions and other items, so the band of an S&P calculation can differ.
- Operating lease cost is reported in the annual report only. Over the last 4 quarters, the lease figures that the quarters do not report are estimated from the latest fiscal year, and every value computed with such an estimate is marked.
Liquidity and MaturitiesCash and operating cash flow against debt due within 12 months, capital expenditure and dividends.
Cash and operating cash flow against debt due within 12 months, capital expenditure and dividends.
These ratios have no value for the figures of this company.
Method
- Debt due within 12 months is the larger of the first year of the maturity schedule and the current portion of long-term debt, plus short-term borrowings. The schedule of a quarterly report can cover the rest of the fiscal year only and leaves out finance leases.
- Capital expenditure and dividends of the fiscal year, or of the last 4 quarters, are taken as those of the next 12 months. Undrawn credit facilities are not included.
Earnings QualityCash-flow accruals −6.3%, Operating cash flow to EBITDA 1.14x · Q2 FY2026
Accruals and the cash backing of reported earnings.
Operating cash flow over the last 4 quarters exceeded net income attributable to the company by an amount equal to 6.3% of average total assets.
Interpretation. The profit came in as cash: operating cash flow was larger than net income. Profit backed by cash tends to repeat more than profit made of accounting entries (Sloan, 1996).
Confirmedin Q2 FY2026 · stated since Q2 FY2024Rule: Cash backing of earnings · Sources 10-Q 2025-06, 10-Q 2026-06, 10-Q 2025-09 and 2 moreHistory of this finding, 10 records
- Q2 FY2026 ConfirmedOperating cash flow over the last 4 quarters exceeded net income attributable to the company by an amount equal to 6.3% of average total assets.Recorded from FY2026Q2_5c00976f · methodology
- Q2 FY2026 WeakenedOperating cash flow over the last 4 quarters exceeded net income attributable to the company by an amount equal to 6.3% of average total assets.Recorded from FY2026Q2_cc2991fc · data update
- Q1 FY2026 StrengthenedOperating cash flow over the last 4 quarters exceeded net income attributable to the company by an amount equal to 9.4% of average total assets.Reconstructed · data update
- Q4 FY2025 ConfirmedOperating cash flow over the last 4 quarters exceeded net income attributable to the company by an amount equal to 5.1% of average total assets.Reconstructed · data update
- Q3 FY2025 WeakenedOperating cash flow over the last 4 quarters exceeded net income attributable to the company by an amount equal to 5.1% of average total assets.Reconstructed · data update
- Q2 FY2025 WeakenedOperating cash flow over the last 4 quarters exceeded net income attributable to the company by an amount equal to 5.7% of average total assets.Reconstructed · data update
- Q1 FY2025 WeakenedOperating cash flow over the last 4 quarters exceeded net income attributable to the company by an amount equal to 6.4% of average total assets.Reconstructed · data update
- Q4 FY2024 StrengthenedOperating cash flow over the last 4 quarters exceeded net income attributable to the company by an amount equal to 7.1% of average total assets.Reconstructed · data update
- Q3 FY2024 StrengthenedOperating cash flow over the last 4 quarters exceeded net income attributable to the company by an amount equal to 4.9% of average total assets.Reconstructed · data update
- Q2 FY2024 NewOperating cash flow over the last 4 quarters exceeded net income attributable to the company by an amount equal to 2.7% of average total assets.Reconstructed · initial
Net Income and Operating Cash Flow
Last 4 quarters at each quarter end, US dollars
By Fiscal Year
| Ratio | FY202131 Dec 2021 | FY202231 Dec 2022 | FY202331 Dec 2023 | FY202431 Dec 2024 | FY202531 Dec 2025 | Q2 FY2026latest quarter |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cash-flow accrualsNet income less operating cash flow, against average assets: the part of profit not received in cash in the same period. Research associates high accruals with lower earnings in later years; a negative figure means cash exceeded profit.(Net income attributable to the company - operating cash flow) / average total assets | ||||||
| Balance sheet accrualsThe same gap between profit and cash, measured from the changes in the balance sheet (Sloan, 1996).[(Change in current assets - change in cash) - (change in current liabilities - change in short-term debt - change in taxes payable) - depreciation and amortisation] / average total assets (Sloan, 1996) | ||||||
| Total accrualsAccruals that also cover long-term operating and financial assets and liabilities (Richardson, Sloan, Soliman and Tuna, 2005). Acquisitions raise the figure.Change in net operating working capital, net non-current operating assets and net financial assets / average total assets (Richardson, Sloan, Soliman and Tuna, 2005) | ||||||
| Operating cash flow to EBITDAOperating cash flow against EBITDA: the part of operating profit before depreciation that turns into cash after interest, tax and changes in stock, receivables and payables.Operating cash flow / (operating income + depreciation and amortisation) | ||||||
| Working capital investment to revenueCash put into receivables and stock, less extra credit from suppliers and customers, as a share of revenue. A positive figure means growth or slower collection uses cash.(Increase in receivables + increase in inventories - increase in payables - increase in contract liabilities) / revenue |
Method
- Cash-flow accruals are net income attributable to the company less operating cash flow, over average total assets. Balance sheet accruals follow Sloan (1996) and total accruals Richardson, Sloan, Soliman and Tuna (2005).
- Balance sheet and total accruals include the assets and liabilities that acquisitions bring in and disposals take out; cash-flow accruals exclude them.
Forensic and Distress ScoresAltman Z'' 8.46, Beneish −2.19 · Piotroski 5 of 9 · Last 4 quarters 8.33 at Q2 FY2026 · FY2025
Published distress and misstatement models, with their original coefficients and thresholds.
The Altman Z'' score for fiscal 2025 was 8.46, above the safe threshold of 2.60.
Interpretation. By this model, the balance sheet and earnings look like those of companies that did not go bankrupt in its original study: above 2.60 means safe, below 1.10 distress.
Weakenedin FY2025 · stated since FY2023Rule: Altman Z'' zone · Sources 10-Q 2026-06, 10-K 2025-12History of this finding, 3 records
- FY2025 WeakenedThe Altman Z'' score for fiscal 2025 was 8.46, above the safe threshold of 2.60.Reconstructed · data update
- FY2024 ConfirmedThe Altman Z'' score for fiscal 2024 was 10.04, above the safe threshold of 2.60.Reconstructed · data update
- FY2023 NewThe Altman Z'' score for fiscal 2023 was 10.24, above the safe threshold of 2.60.Reconstructed · initial
The Beneish M-score for fiscal 2025 was minus 2.19, below the model threshold of minus 1.78.
Interpretation. The model finds no sign of earnings manipulation. Beneish (1999) set a threshold of minus 1.78, above which a company resembles the companies that manipulated their earnings.
Weakenedin FY2025 · stated since FY2023Rule: Beneish M-score against its threshold · Sources 10-K 2025-12, 10-K 2024-12, 10-Q 2025-03 and 1 moreHistory of this finding, 3 records
- FY2025 WeakenedThe Beneish M-score for fiscal 2025 was minus 2.19, below the model threshold of minus 1.78.Reconstructed · data update
- FY2024 StrengthenedThe Beneish M-score for fiscal 2024 was minus 2.70, below the model threshold of minus 1.78.Reconstructed · data update
- FY2023 NewThe Beneish M-score for fiscal 2023 was minus 2.38, below the model threshold of minus 1.78.Reconstructed · initial
The Piotroski F-score for fiscal 2025 was 5 of 9. The 4 signals not met were return on assets higher than a year earlier, current ratio higher than a year earlier, margin higher than a year earlier and asset turnover higher than a year earlier.
Interpretation. The score counts how many of 9 tests of profit, debt, liquidity and efficiency the company passes. A score of 4 to 6 is the middle group: Piotroski (2000) placed 7 to 9 in the strongest group and 0 to 3 in the weakest.
Confirmedin FY2025 · stated since FY2024Rule: Piotroski F-score · Sources 10-K 2024-12, 10-K 2025-12, 10-Q 2025-03 and 1 moreHistory of this finding, 4 records
- FY2025 ConfirmedThe Piotroski F-score for fiscal 2025 was 5 of 9. The 4 signals not met were return on assets higher than a year earlier, current ratio higher than a year earlier, margin higher than a year earlier and asset turnover higher than a year earlier.Reconstructed · data update
- FY2024 NewThe Piotroski F-score for fiscal 2024 was 6 of 9. The 3 signals not met were return on assets higher than a year earlier, current ratio higher than a year earlier and asset turnover higher than a year earlier.Reconstructed · data update
- Q4 FY2024 RetiredThe finding changed to a middle score.Reconstructed · data update
- FY2023 NewThe Piotroski F-score for fiscal 2023 was 8 of 9. The signal not met was operating cash flow above net income.Reconstructed · initial
By Fiscal Year
| Ratio | FY202131 Dec 2021 | FY202231 Dec 2022 | FY202331 Dec 2023 | FY202431 Dec 2024 | FY202531 Dec 2025 | Q2 FY2026latest quarter |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Altman Z'' scoreA measure of the risk of financial distress, built from working capital, retained earnings, operating profit and equity. Above 2.60 the model counts a company as safe and below 1.10 as in distress; between the 2 is a grey zone.6.56 x working capital / total assets + 3.26 x retained earnings / total assets + 6.72 x EBIT / total assets + 1.05 x total equity / total liabilities (Altman, 1995); distress zone below 1.10, safe zone above 2.60 | safe zone | safe zone | safe zone | safe zone | safe zone | safe zone |
| Beneish M-scoreA screen for earnings manipulation, built from 8 changes in the accounts, such as receivables growing faster than sales. Above minus 1.78 the model groups a company with the companies in the Beneish sample that manipulated their earnings.-4.84 + 0.920 DSRI + 0.528 GMI + 0.404 AQI + 0.892 SGI + 0.115 DEPI - 0.172 SGAI + 4.679 TATA - 0.327 LVGI (Beneish, 1999); model threshold -1.78 | below threshold | above threshold | below threshold | below threshold | below threshold | n/a |
| Dechow F-scoreThe probability of a material misstatement in the accounts, estimated from accruals, receivables, stock, cash sales, profitability and new financing, against the average. A score of 1 means average risk and 2 means twice the average.Predicted probability of a misstatement (model 1 of Dechow, Ge, Larson and Sloan, 2011) / 0.0037, the unconditional probability; 1 equals the base rate | n/a | n/a | ||||
| Piotroski F-scoreA count of 9 yes or no tests on profitability, cash flow, debt, liquidity, new shares, margins and the use of assets. A score of 7 to 9 indicates improving strength and 0 to 3 indicates weakness.Number of 9 binary signals met on profitability, cash flow, debt, liquidity, equity issuance, margin and asset turnover (Piotroski, 2000) | n/a | n/a |
Altman Z'' Score
Altman Z'' Score
fiscal 2025
A measure of the risk of financial distress, built from working capital, retained earnings, operating profit and equity. Above 2.60 the model counts a company as safe and below 1.10 as in distress; between the 2 is a grey zone.
| Distress zone, below 1.10 | Grey zone, 1.10 to 2.60 | 8.46Safe zone, above 2.60 |
The score of 8.46 is in the safe zone of the model, above 2.60. The largest part is working capital, at 3.71.
| Part | Value | Coefficient | Contribution |
|---|---|---|---|
| Working capital / total assetsCurrent assets less current liabilities, against total assets: the short-term funds available for operations. | 0.566 | 6.560 | 3.714 |
| Retained earnings / total assetsProfits kept in the business over its life, against total assets. | 0.486 | 3.260 | 1.583 |
| EBIT / total assetsOperating profit against total assets: the earning power of the assets. | 0.198 | 6.720 | 1.332 |
| Total equity / total liabilitiesBook equity against liabilities: how far the assets could fall in value before liabilities exceed them. | 1.748 | 1.050 | 1.835 |
| Score | 8.465 |
Altman, Hartzell and Peck (1995), for non-manufacturing companies. The model omits the ratio of sales to total assets of the 1968 model and uses book equity. Working capital below zero and equity reduced by share repurchases lower the score.
Beneish M-score
Beneish M-score
fiscal 2025
A screen for earnings manipulation, built from 8 changes in the accounts, such as receivables growing faster than sales. Above minus 1.78 the model groups a company with the companies in the Beneish sample that manipulated their earnings.
| −2.19Below the threshold, −1.78 and below | Above the threshold, above −1.78 |
The score of minus 2.19 is below the model threshold of minus 1.78. Of the 8 measures, receivables against sales raises the score most.
| Part | Value | Coefficient | Contribution |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intercept | −4.840 | ||
| Days sales in receivables indexReceivables against sales, against a year earlier. A rise can mean sales recorded before customers pay. | 1.287 | 0.920 | 1.184 |
| Gross margin indexGross margin a year earlier against the current gross margin. Above 1, margins fell, which the model treats as a risk factor. | 1.001 | 0.528 | 0.529 |
| Asset quality indexAssets other than current assets and property, plant and equipment, as a share of total assets, against a year earlier. A rise can mean more costs recorded as assets. | 1.015 | 0.404 | 0.410 |
| Sales growth indexSales against a year earlier. The model treats fast growth as a risk factor. | 1.286 | 0.892 | 1.147 |
| Depreciation indexThe rate of depreciation a year earlier against the current rate. Above 1, depreciation slowed, which raises profit. | 1.939 | 0.115 | 0.223 |
| Selling, general and administrative expenses indexOverheads against sales, against a year earlier. | 1.000 | −0.172 | −0.172 |
| Total accruals to total assetsNet income less operating cash flow, against total assets: profit not backed by cash. It carries the largest coefficient in the model. | −0.044 | 4.679 | −0.207 |
| Leverage indexDebt against total assets, against a year earlier. | 1.421 | −0.327 | −0.465 |
| Score | −2.191 |
Beneish (1999), estimated on 74 companies identified as earnings manipulators in SEC enforcement releases and the press for 1982 to 1992, against 2,332 Compustat companies. The model classes a score above minus 1.78 with the first group. An index whose inputs are not reported counts as 1.
Dechow F-score
Dechow F-score
fiscal 2025
The probability of a material misstatement in the accounts, estimated from accruals, receivables, stock, cash sales, profitability and new financing, against the average. A score of 1 means average risk and 2 means twice the average.
A score of 0.83 means a probability of a misstatement 0.83 times the average rate in the Dechow sample: 0.31% against 0.37%.
| Part | Value | Coefficient | Contribution |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intercept | −7.893 | ||
| Total accruals (Richardson, Sloan, Soliman and Tuna)Total accruals: the growth of operating and financial assets net of liabilities, against average assets. | 0.190 | 0.790 | 0.150 |
| Change in receivables / average total assetsThe growth of receivables against average assets. | 0.045 | 2.518 | 0.112 |
| Change in inventories / average total assetsThe growth of stock against average assets. | 0.025 | 1.191 | 0.029 |
| Assets other than cash and property, plant and equipment / total assetsAssets other than cash and property, plant and equipment, as a share of total assets: assets whose value depends more on judgement. | 0.889 | 1.979 | 1.758 |
| Change in cash salesThe growth of sales collected in cash. | 0.198 | 0.171 | 0.034 |
| Change in return on assetsThe change in return on assets against a year earlier. A fall raises the score. | −0.028 | −0.932 | 0.026 |
| Debt or equity issued in the year, 1 or 01 when the company issued shares or debt in the year. | 0.000 | 1.029 | 0.000 |
| Predicted value | −5.783 | ||
| Probability of a misstatement | 0.31% |
Model 1 of Dechow, Ge, Larson and Sloan (2011), estimated on misstatements named in SEC Accounting and Auditing Enforcement Releases. The score is the predicted probability of a misstatement over 0.37%, the unconditional probability in their sample, so 1.00 equals that base rate.
Piotroski F-score
Piotroski F-score
fiscal 2025
A count of 9 yes or no tests on profitability, cash flow, debt, liquidity, new shares, margins and the use of assets. A score of 7 to 9 indicates improving strength and 0 to 3 indicates weakness.
5 of the 9 tests are met, in the middle group of 4 to 6.
| Signal | FY2025 | FY2024 |
|---|---|---|
| Return on assets above zero | Met | Met |
| Operating cash flow above zero | Met | Met |
| Return on assets higher than a year earlier | Not met | Not met |
| Operating cash flow above net income | Met | Met |
| Long-term debt to assets lower than a year earlier | Met | Met |
| Current ratio higher than a year earlier | Not met | Not met |
| No common equity issued | Met | Met |
| Margin higher than a year earlier | Not met | Met |
| Asset turnover higher than a year earlier | Not met | Not met |
Piotroski (2000), 9 signals on profitability, funding and operating efficiency, designed for companies with high book-to-market ratios. Piotroski grouped scores of 8 and 9 as high and 0 and 1 as low; the findings group 7 to 9 and 0 to 3.
Source Documents
Documents of this snapshot, latest first.
Checks
Data Quality
How many values of this snapshot the checks prove, and how many Annalist derives, withholds and tracks as restated. Every company.
| Values published | 1,323 |
| Proven by a check | 44.9%, 594 values |
| Confirmed by a second document | 0.0%, 0 values |
| Derived from reported figures | 20.0%, 265 values |
| Values withheld | 1 |
| Restated figures tracked | 188 |
| Changes compared on one basis | 26 |
| Company lines mapped | 0 of 0 reviewed |
Citation
Snapshot FY2026Q2_2c2dfa16 · dataset SHA-256 2c2dfa167cf2eed918b8c4ea634efd972af272fc7f0060c29c8830455f65815a · findings rules 0.4
Data: info.json · dataset.json · validation.json · documents.json